Legislature(2013 - 2014)HOUSE FINANCE 519

04/11/2013 09:00 AM House FINANCE


Download Mp3. <- Right click and save file as

* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
-- Continued at 1:15 a.m. on 4/12/13 --
+= SB 21 OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION TAX TELECONFERENCED
Moved HCS CSSB 21(FIN) Out of Committee
+ SB 47 DISTRICT OPERATED BOARDING SCHOOLS TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
+ SB 83 INTEREST ON CORPORATION INCOME TAX TELECONFERENCED
Moved HCS CSSB 83(FIN) Out of Committee
+ SB 85 EXPERIMENTAL VEHICLE PLATES TELECONFERENCED
Moved Out of Committee
+ SB 62 SCHOOL CONST. GRANTS/SMALL MUNICIPALITIES TELECONFERENCED
Scheduled But Not Heard
+= SB 18 BUDGET: CAPITAL TELECONFERENCED
Scheduled But Not Heard
+ Bills Previously Heard/Scheduled TELECONFERENCED
+= SB 22 CRIMES; VICTIMS; CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT TELECONFERENCED
Moved HCS CSSB 22(FIN) Out of Committee
+= SB 7 CORPORATE INCOME TAX TELECONFERENCED
Scheduled But Not Heard
+= SB 88 ALASKA NATIVE MEDICAL CENTER HOUSING TELECONFERENCED
Moved Out of Committee
+ SB 65 RETIREMENT PLANS; ROTH IRAS; PROBATE TELECONFERENCED
Moved Out of Committee
+= SB 27 REGULATION OF DREDGE AND FILL ACTIVITIES TELECONFERENCED
Moved Out of Committee
CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 83(FIN)                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
     "An  Act  relating  to   the  corporation  income  tax;                                                                    
     relating  to  the  computation of  interest  under  the                                                                    
     look-back method  applicable to long-term  contracts in                                                                    
     the  Internal  Revenue  Code;   and  providing  for  an                                                                    
     effective date."                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
Representative   Costello   moved   the  bill   before   the                                                                    
committee.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
10:27:28 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR  PETER  MICCICHE,   SPONSOR,  communicated  that  in                                                                    
addition to its focus on  corporate income tax, the bill was                                                                    
about fairness  and simplicity.  He detailed  that currently                                                                    
for  state   and  federal  corporate  income   tax  purposes                                                                    
contractors  undertaking large  multi-year projects  such as                                                                    
highways,  schools, and  university buildings  were required                                                                    
to  estimate their  total profit  on  a project  and to  pay                                                                    
income  tax on  the portion  of the  project completed  in a                                                                    
given tax year. He stated  that it was impossible to predict                                                                    
in the  first year of  the project  what the actual  cost or                                                                    
profit would  be. He furthered  that upon completion  of the                                                                    
project and once the profit  amount had been determined, the                                                                    
contractor  filed look-back  taxes (an  amended return).  He                                                                    
expounded that a contractor either  owed additional taxes or                                                                    
received a refund based on  whether the profit had been over                                                                    
or  under estimated;  interest was  owed  on the  additional                                                                    
taxes due or the refund to be paid.                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
Senator Micciche relayed that  although the Internal Revenue                                                                    
Service (IRS)  code had  a specific  provision for  over and                                                                    
under  payments  of  estimated   taxes  for  the  multi-year                                                                    
projects, existing state laws  considered the payments to be                                                                    
delinquent  and applied  an 11  percent  interest rate.  The                                                                    
state made  no distinction between its  system of estimating                                                                    
taxes  based on  a  contractor's best  knowledge  and a  tax                                                                    
payer who  did not make  a timely filing. He  believed there                                                                    
should be a  distinction. He stated that the  bill would tie                                                                    
the interest  rate to a  recognized index as opposed  to the                                                                    
11  percent  interest  currently   paid  by  the  state  and                                                                    
contractors.  He  noted  that  the  current  interest  rates                                                                    
charged by the state were outdated.                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
Senator Micciche  expounded that the bill  would correct the                                                                    
interest issue,  simplify the  process for  contractors, and                                                                    
adopt the  IRS bulletin rates  for look-back taxes  on long-                                                                    
term projects allowing contractors and  the state to use the                                                                    
same interest pay  schedules for state taxes  as the federal                                                                    
system. Currently the interest rate  was 2 percent for under                                                                    
payments when  the profit had  been underestimated  and over                                                                    
payments when the state owed  money in the amount of $10,000                                                                    
or less;  interest was  currently levied  at 0.5  percent on                                                                    
amounts  greater  than $10,000.  He  relayed  that the  rate                                                                    
fluctuated  and was  published quarterly.  The CS  specified                                                                    
the  tax policy  would  be  in effect  for  the entire  2013                                                                    
calendar tax year.                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
10:30:10 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair  Stoltze  stated  that  there  were  two  potential                                                                    
amendments.  He   expressed  desire  for  a   more  thorough                                                                    
discussion on  the legislation and how  the amendments would                                                                    
impact  it.  He  thought  the second  amendment  related  to                                                                    
helping commercial seiners in Southeast.                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Senator Micciche  noted that the second  potential amendment                                                                    
related to hatcheries.  He reiterated the bill  focused on a                                                                    
fairness issue.  He pointed to  multiple letters  of support                                                                    
from  general   contractors,  the  Association   of  General                                                                    
Contractors,   bankers,  public   accountants,  surety   and                                                                    
bonding brokers,  and others. He  emphasized the  bill would                                                                    
be good for  the state. He relayed that he  would review the                                                                    
amendments. He  stated that  he had worked  on the  bill all                                                                    
session  and would  prefer  to not  include  items that  may                                                                    
prevent the bill from moving forward in the current year.                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Stoltze communicated his  desire for a deliberative                                                                    
discussion.                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
JOHN  MACKINNON,  EXECUTIVE   DIRECTOR,  ASSOCIATED  GENERAL                                                                    
CONTRACTORS OF ALASKA, was available for questions.                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
Representative Costello  asked for Mr. Mackinnon  to comment                                                                    
on the bill.                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Mr. Mackinnon  testified in support  of the bill.  He stated                                                                    
that an  11 percent  interest rate had  been in  place since                                                                    
the early  1980s. He remarked  that his first home  loan had                                                                    
been over 10 percent in 1981.   The bill brought the rate in                                                                    
line  with  the  current  federal  rate  and  made  a  clear                                                                    
distinction that  the returns were  amended. He  opined that                                                                    
referring to an amended return  as a delinquent tax unfairly                                                                    
characterized  contractors' and  C corporations'  efforts to                                                                    
be  honest. He  furthered that  the current  system unfairly                                                                    
penalized  C corporations,  given  that they  were the  only                                                                    
businesses  paying taxes  to the  state.  He explained  that                                                                    
most   contractors    were   limited    partnerships,   sole                                                                    
proprietorships or S corporations that paid no taxes.                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair  Stoltze recalled  that the  state had  opposed the                                                                    
imposition of the  interest rate when it  had been litigated                                                                    
against by out-of-state commercial  fishermen in the Carlson                                                                    
case.  He  communicated  that  the state  had  gone  to  the                                                                    
supreme court  on the unfairness  of the rates.  He believed                                                                    
the state was  on the record related to its  position on the                                                                    
interest rates.                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
10:35:45 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
IDONNA  PIPER   NELSON,  PARTNER,  DAVIS   CONSTRUCTORS  AND                                                                    
ENGINEERS,  ANCHORAGE (via  teleconference), spoke  in favor                                                                    
of the bill.  She relayed that the company had  chosen to be                                                                    
a C  corporation; it was  not objecting to paying  the look-                                                                    
back taxes,  but wanted to  be treated  the same way  by the                                                                    
state as  it was  by the federal  government. She  had begun                                                                    
work on the  issue with legislators during  the past several                                                                    
years. She  thanked the committee  and urged the  passage of                                                                    
the legislation.                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Stoltze CLOSED public testimony.                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair   Stoltze  discussed   the  amendments   and  asked                                                                    
sponsors to provide them to his office.                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
SB  83  was   HEARD  and  HELD  in   committee  for  further                                                                    
consideration.                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
[Note: The  meeting was  recessed at  10:41 p.m.  until 1:12                                                                    
a.m. on  April 12, 2013  and CSSB 83(FIN) was  reported from                                                                    
committee  at  that time.  See  April  12, 2013,  1:12  a.m.                                                                    
minutes for detail.]                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
10:38:28 AM                                                                                                                   
RECESSED                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
1:53:19 PM                                                                                                                    
RECONVENED                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                

Document Name Date/Time Subjects
ADM Statewide.pdf HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 47
AFN 2012 Resolution.pdf HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 47
Alaska Dispatch are Boarding Schools the Solution.pdf HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 47
Boarding School Enrollees By City.pdf HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 47
Chugach SB47 Testimony.pdf HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 47
CITC Letter of Support.pdf HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 47
Delete Secondary Amendment.pdf HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 47
Galena School Letter Dec 2012.pdf HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 47
North Slope School District Letter.pdf HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 47
Residential Boarding Homes 2013Summary 3 6 13.pdf HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 47
ResidentialActualCostsFY09-FY13 3 12 13.pdf HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 47
SchoolClosuresFY99-FY13_3-4-13.pdf HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 47
Sectional Analysis Version H (S)FIIN.pdf HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 47
Sponsor Statement Version H.pdf HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 47
Support Letter for SB 47 Nenana.pdf HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 47
SW School District Resolution.pdf HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 47
SB 83 Support Letter - THG - Mason.pdf HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 83
SB 83 Support Letter - THG - Branson.pdf HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 83
SB 83 Support Letter - PSFleek.pdf HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 83
SB 83 Support Letter - Cons Ent.pdf HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 83
SB 83 Support Letter - AGC.pdf HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 83
SB 83 SFIN CS Sponsor Statement scanned.pdf HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 83
Interest on Under-Overpayments on Fed Taxes.pdf HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 83
Interest on Under-Overpayments on Fed Taxes.pdf HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 83
Interest Rate Table.pdf HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 83
26 USC 460.pdf HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 83
Sectional Analysis Version H (S)FIIN.pdf HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 83
CSSB 85 Alaska Aerofuel Letter of Support.pdf HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 85
CSSB 85 FEDCo Letter of Support.pdf HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 85
CSSB 85 Sponsor Statement.pdf HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 85
CSSB 85 VWGoA Support.pdf HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 85
HCS CSSB 22(FIN), version R.pdf HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 22
SB 21 CS WORKDRAFT 4.11.13 L.pdf HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 21
SB 47 Amenmedments 1&2 Edgemon -CSSBFIN.pdf HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 47
SB 21 Econ One/DOR HFIN (4-11-13)corrected.pdf HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 21
SB 83 Amendments 1 & 2.pdf HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 83
SB 22 Amendments Gara Holmes CS FIN.pdf HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 22
SB 21 Amendments CS FIN 1-14.pdf HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 21
SB 21 Amendments CS FIN 15 & 7.pdf HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 21
DOR responses slides - 20130411.pdf HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 21
SB 65 Sponsor Statement P version.PDF HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 65
SB 65 Sectional P version.PDF HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 65
SB 83 Additional Support.pdf HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 83
SB 21 Opposition additional.pdf HFIN 4/11/2013 9:00:00 AM
SB 21